doi: 10.32652/olympic2020.4_7

Objective: The authors considered the need of concluding the arbitration agreement to apply to an international arbitration court for sport disputes resolution. As well as, types of arbitration agreements; the problems of applying national courts for sport disputes resolution; history and definition of the agreement; effects of the arbitration agreement and positive and negative doctrine of these effects, according to the current paradigm of modern sport are described. Methods. This article developed based on the grounded theory to close the gap between theory and empirical research in modern sport problems which needs to metadiciplinary approach for sport dispute resolution under an arbitration agreement. Additionally, research on private international law, international legal acts in the field of sport: Code of International Sport Arbitration on November 22, 1994, Olympic Charter, European Charter for Sport, New York Convention, 1958, UNCITRAL Model Law 2006, judicial practice of the International Sports Arbitration Court, laws in the field of physical culture and sport, etc. Results. Parties of a contract which directly or indirectly connected to sport activities need to architect and agree on method(s) of sport dispute resolution, to realize this aim, the parties need to conclude an arbitration agreement. To understand arbitration agreement, it is needed to understand the definition and history of agreement. Arbitration agreement defines scopes of sport dispute resolution, the jurisdiction of sport arbitration institution; as well as, circumstances which may affect the conditions for recognition and enforcement of awards issued by the sport arbitration courts. Conclusions: Sport arbitration practices show that because of the existence of sport problematic and mutual rights and obligations of parties, the dispute is an inseparable part of sport. Parties of a sport contract need to architect and agree on method(s) of sport dispute resolution, to realize this aim, the parties need to conclude an arbitration agreement. The article II of the New York Convention (1958) rules obligation of the contracting States to recognize and enforce arbitration agreements. An arbitration agreement may be concluded as a separate agreement or a clause to a contract related to sport, before or after arising a sport dispute. There are four types of arbitration agreements and courts have relatio perfecta and relatio imperfecta approach to them. The majority of domestic and international laws, rule the arbitration agreement to identify a “defined legal relationship”. Therefore, parties by applying to an arbitration court according to an arbitration agreement cause two effects which they have “positive” or “negative” doctrines.

Literature

1. Noshadha S. Levels, Status and Categories of Sport Disputes [Internet]. Kyiv: XIII International Conference Youths and Olympic Movement These; 2020. p 37. [Accessed 2020 May 06]. Available from: https://uni-sport.edu.ua/sites/default/files/vseDocumenti/molod_xiii_zbirnyk__0.pdf
2. Noshadha S, Kushnir Zh. Modern Sport and Dispute Resolution at the International Arena. Science in Olympic Sport; 2020. 64. [Accessed 2020 June 06]. DOI:10.32652/olympic2020.2_7
3. Roger B. Mithraism [Internet]. New York: Encyclopaedia Iranica; 2002. [Accessed 2020 May 06]. Available from: https://iranicaonline.org/articles/mithraism
4. Burkert W. Ancient Mystery Cults [Print]. New York: The American Journal of Philology: published by the Johns Hopkins University Press; 1989. pp 658-660. Volume 110; No 4. [Accessed 2020 May 08]. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/295287?seq=1 DOI: 10.2307/295287
5. Muscarella WO. Jiroft [Internet]. New York: Encyclopaedia Iranica; 2012. [Accessed 2020 May 08]. Available from: https://iranicaonline.org/articles/jiroft-iii-general-survey-of-excavations
6. Potts DT. The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p 91. [Accessed 2020 May 08]. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Archaeology-Elam-Formation-Transfor-mation-Cambridge/dp/1107476631
7. Joshua JM. Cuneiform [Internet]. Quebec: Ancient History Encyclopedia Foundation; 2018. [Accessed 2020 May 08]. Available from: https://www.ancient.eu/cuneiform/
8. Lamberg-Karlovsky C. C. & Sabloff A. Ancient Civilizations: The Near East and Mesoamerica [2 nd ed.]. Illinois: Waveland Press; 1995. [Accessed 2020 May 11]. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Ancient-Civilizations-Near-East-Mesoamerica/dp/0881338346
9. Shotwell J. T. An introduction to the history of history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1922. [Accessed 2020 May 08]. Available from: http://malcat.uum.edu.my/kip/Record/um.u23/Details
10. Clauss M. The Roman Cult of Mithras: The God and His Mysteries. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2000. [Accessed 2020 May 08]. Available from: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Roman-Cult-Mithras-God-Mysteries/dp/074861396X
11. Macdonell A A. Vedic mythology. Strasbourg: Publishing House Karl J. Trubner; 1897. p 27. [Accessed 2020 May 10]. Available from: https://archive.org/details/vedicmythology00macduoft/page/n27/mode/2up
12. Monichino A. Pathological Arbitration Clauses Revisited: Gallaway Allan Cook v Carr [Internet]. USA: Wolters Kluwer; 2015; 2 (17): 97-102. [Accessed 2020 May 10]. Available from: https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Asian+Dispute+Review/17.2/ADR2015019
13. Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). [Internet]. Lausanne; CAS. [Accessed 2020 May 10]. Available from: https://www.tas-cas.org
12. The International Sports Federations (IFs). [Internet]. Lausanne; IOC. [Accessed 2020 May 10]. Available from: https://www.olympic.org/ioc-governance-international-sports-federations
15. The Olympic Charter. [Internet]. Lausanne; IOC. [Accessed 2020 May 10]. Available from: https://www.olympic.org/documents/olympic-charter
16. The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. [Internet]. New York Convention; 1958. [Accessed 2020 May 12]. Available from: http://www.newyorkconvention.org/english
17. Villani A, Caccialanza C. Arbitration Clauses Incorporated by Reference: An Overview of the Pragmatic Approach Developed by European Courts [Internet]. USA: Wolters Kluwer; 2015. [Accessed 2020 May 12]. Available from: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2015/03/03/arbitration-clauses-incorporated-by-reference-an-overview-of-the-pragmatic-approach-developed-by-european-courts/
18. Brussels Court of Appeal. [Internet]. Brussels: Hof van Beroep Brussel. [Accessed 2020 June 12]. Available from: https://www.tribunaux-rechtbanken.be/fr/cour-dappel-de-bruxelles
19. The UNCITRAL Model Law 2006. [Internet]. Vienna: United Nation; 2006. [Accessed 2020 June 12]. Available from: https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/ml-arb/07-86998_Ebook.pdf
20. FIFA [Internet]. Zurich. [Accessed 2020 June 12]. Available from: https://www.fifa.com
21. ICCA Guide to the Interpretation of the New York Convention 1958. [Internet]. ICCA; 2011. [Accessed 2020 May 13]. Available from: https://www.arbitration-icca.org/media/0/13365477041670/judges_guide_english_composite_final_revised_may_2012.pdf
22. European Convention on Human Rights. [Internet]. Rome: Council of Europe-European Court of Human Rights; 1950. [Accessed 2020 May 15]. Available from: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf
23. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. [Internet]. European Union; 2012. [Accessed 2020 May 15]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/?uri=celex:12012P/TXT

Received: 14.12.2020